Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Lori Myers v. Starbucks Corporation, et al
as 22-55930
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LORI MYERS, an individual, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
Defendant:
STARBUCKS CORPORATION, a Washington Corporation
Defendant / Appellee:
MARS WRIGLEY CONFECTIONERY US, LLC, A Delaware Corporation and THE QUAKER OATS COMPANY, a New Jersey Corporation
Lori Myers v. Starbucks Corporation et al
as 5:2020cv00335
Defendant:
STARBUCKS CORPORATION, a Washington corporation, dba, Starbucks #6849, The Quaker Oats Company, Does 1-10, inclusive and others
Petitioner:
Mars, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Lori Myers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Morgan Steckler v. Pepsico, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv09211
Defendant:
The Quaker Oats Company, Inc. and Pepsico, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Morgan Steckler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Darren Eisenlord, et al v. The Quaker Oats Company
as 18-55467
:
In re: QUAKER OATS MAPLE & BROWN SUGAR INSTANT OATMEAL LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARREN EISENLORD, BARBARA GATES, KEVIN PHUNG and others
Defendant - Appellee:
THE QUAKER OATS COMPANY
Courtney Drey v. The Quaker Oats Company
as 2:2017cv00943
Plaintiff:
Courtney Drey
Defendant:
The Quaker Oats Company
Kevin Phung v. Quaker Oats Company, The
as 2:2017cv00499
Plaintiff:
Kevin Phung
Defendant:
Quaker Oats Company, The
Kinn v. The Quaker Oats Company
as 2:2016cv01262
Defendant:
The Quaker Oats Company
Plaintiff:
Katelyn Kinn and Matthew Price
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BARBARA GATES v. THE QUAKER OATS COMPANY
as 2:2016cv05765
Plaintiff:
BARBARA GATES
Defendant:
The Quaker Oats Company
Matthew Palmer et al v. The Quaker Oats Company
as 2:2016cv03451
Plaintiff:
Annette Martinez and Matthew Palmer
Defendant:
The Quaker Oats Company
Cooper v. The Quaker Oats Company
as 3:2016cv02364
Plaintiff:
Danielle S Cooper
Defendant:
The Quaker Oats Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
