Other Statutes Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 68
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau et al. v. Stratfs, LLC et al.
as 2:2024ms00010
Defendant: Stratfs, LLC, Strategic Client Support, Anchor Client Services, LLC and others
Plaintiff: Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, The People of the State of New York, Attorney General of the State of New York and others
Receiver: Thomas W. McNamara
Scioli v. United States of America, et al.
as 23-3373
Plaintiff / Appellant: DANA SCIOLI
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and STATE OF COLORADO
Scioli v. USA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv01041
Plaintiff: Dana Scioli
Defendant: USA and State of Colorado
State of Washington, et al v. FDA, et al
as 23-35294
Plaintiff / Appellee: STATE OF WASHINGTON, STATE OF OREGON, STATE OF ARIZONA and others
Defendant / Appellee: U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION, ROBERT M. CALIFF, in his official capacity as Commissioner of Food and Drugs, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Petitioner / Appellant: STATE OF IDAHO, STATE OF IOWA, STATE OF MONTANA and others
Lana Renna, et al v. Rob Bonta, et al
as 23-55367
Plaintiff / Appellee: LANA RAE RENNA, DANIELLE JAYMES, HANNAH SPOUSTA and others
Defendant / Appellant: ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of California and ALLISON MENDOZA, in her official capacity as Director of Department of Justice Bureau of Firearms
Amicus Curiae: BRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, THE STATES OF COLORADO, CONNECTICUT, DELAWARE, HAWAII, ILLINOIS, MARYLAND, MASSACHUSETTS, MICHIGAN, MINNESOTA, NEW JERSEY, NEW YORK, OREGON, PENNSYLVANIA, and RHODE ISLAND, EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY and others
Lance Boland, et al v. Rob Bonta, et al
as 23-55276
Plaintiff / Appellee: LANCE BOLAND, an individual, MARIO SANTELLAN, an individual, RENO MAY, an individual and others
Defendant / Appellant: ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California
Defendant: DOES, 1-10
Amicus Curiae: BRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, STATES OF COLORADO, CONNECTICUT, DELAWARE, HAWAII, ILLINOIS, MASSACHUSETTS, MICHIGAN, MINNESOTA, NEW JERSEY, NEW YORK, OREGON, PENNSYLVANIA, and RHODE ISLAND and others
State of Washington et al v. United States Food and Drug Administration et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv03026
Plaintiff: State of Washington, State of Oregon, State of Arizona and others
Defendant: United States Food and Drug Administration, Robert M Califf, United States Department of Health and Human Services and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: State of Idaho, State of Iowa, State of Montana and others
Amicus Curiae: Legal Voice, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American Medical Association and others
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act - Right of Review
Save the Colorado, et al v. USDOI, et al
as 23-15247
Plaintiff / Appellant: SAVE THE COLORADO, LIVING RIVERS and CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
Defendant / Appellee: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and DEB HAALAND, Secretary of the Interior
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: COLORADO RIVER ENERGY DISTRIBUTORS ASSOCIATION, STATE OF NEVADA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Cartwright v. People of The State of Colorado et al
as 3:2023cv00116
Plaintiff: Shondel Inez Cartwright
Defendant: People of The State of Colorado, Colorado Department of Corrections, Colorado State Board of Parole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy to interfere with civil rights
In re: Washington Cattlemen's Association, et al v. USDC-CAOAK
as 22-70194
Not Classified By Court: In re: WASHINGTON CATTLEMEN'S ASSOCAITION, PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION, STATE OF ALABAMA and others
Petitioner: AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, AMERICAN FOREST RESOURCE COUNCIL, AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE and others
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?