Cases 21 - 30 of 68
State Of New York et al v. Scalia
as 1:2020cv01689
Plaintiff:
District of Columbia, State of Colorado, State of Minnesota and others
Defendant:
United States Department of Labor, Eugene Scalia and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Make the Road New York et al v. Pompeo et al
as 1:2019cv11633
Defendant:
Alex Azar, Michael Pompeo, Donald Trump and others
Plaintiff:
Catholic Charities Community Services (Archdiocese of New York), Diana Doe, Brenda Doe and others
Amicus Curiae:
State of Hawaii, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, City of Chicago and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
State of New York v. Department of Energy
as 19-3652
Petitioner:
State of Maine, The Commonwealth of Massachusetts, State of Michigan and others
Respondent:
United States Department of Energy and Rick Perry, United States Department of Energy
United States of America ex re v. Abbvie Inc.
as 19-2947
Plaintiff / Appellant:
State of North Carolina ex rel. John R. Borzilleri, M.D., State of Texas ex rel. John R. Borzilleri, M.D., State of New York ex rel. John R. Borzilleri, M.D. and others
Defendant:
Anthem, Inc., formerly Wellpoint, CVS Caremark, Eli Lilly & Company and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Humana Inc., Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, CVS Health Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
ABC
State of New York et al v. Deutsche Telekom AG et al
as 1:2019cv05434
Plaintiff:
District of Columbia, State of Colorado, State of Maryland and others
Defendant:
Softbank Group Corp., T-Mobile US, Inc., Deutsche Telekom AG and others
Petitioner:
Charter Communications, Inc., Altice USA, Inc., Samsung Electronics America, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 at
State of New York et al v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 1:2019cv04676
Plaintiff:
STATE OF NEVADA, STATE OF MARYLAND, STATE OF CONNECTICUT and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and ALEX M. AZAR II
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Public Health Solutions, Inc., Planned Parenthood of Northern New England, Inc., Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc. and others
Amicus Curiae:
Institute for Policy Integrity, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the American College of Osteopathic Obstetricians and Gynecologists and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Dr. Regina Renee Frost and Christian Medical and Dental Associations
Consolidated Defendant:
Roger Severino, Office for Civil Rights and Office for Civil Rights of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Connecticut et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.
as 3:2019cv00710
Plaintiff:
State of North Dakota, State of North Carolina, State of Minnesota and others
Defendant:
Actavis Pharma, Inc., Richard Rogerson, Nisha Patel and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
State of New York v. Donald Trump
as 18-1988
Plaintiff - Appellee:
State of New York, State of Massachusetts, State of Washington and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, Kirstjen M. Nielsen, Secretary of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
State of New York v. Donald Trump
as 18-1987
Plaintiff - Appellee:
State of New York, State of Massachusetts, State of Washington and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, Kirstjen M. Nielsen, Secretary of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
State of New York v. Donald Trump
as 18-1525
Plaintiff - Appellee:
State of New York, State of Massachusetts, State of Washington and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Donald J. Trump, in his official capacity as President of the United States, United States Department of Homeland Security, Kirstjen M. Nielsen, in her official capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
