Cases filed in Indiana
K.C. v. THE INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS OF THE MEDICAL LICENSING BOARD OF INDIANA, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00595
Plaintiff: K. C., NATHANIEL CLAWSON, BETH CLAWSON and others
Defendant: THE INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS OF THE MEDICAL LICENSING BOARD OF INDIANA, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, INDIANA PROFESSIONAL LICENSING AGENCY, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF INDIANA and others
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF ARKANSAS, State of Alabama, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Interested Party: GENDERNEXUS, INC. and GENDER EXPANSIVE KIDS & COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
State of Indiana et al v. Medical Informatics Engineering Inc et al
as 3:2018cv00969
Plaintiff: State of Arkansas, State of North Carolina, State of Minnesota and others
Defendant: NoMoreClipboard, LLC, Medical Informatics Engineering Inc and Medical Informatics Engineering Inc doing business as Enterprise Health LLC doing business as K&L Holdings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1320 Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act
THORNTON v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION et al
as 4:2013cv00019
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, JANE DOE, JOHN DOE and others
Miscellaneou: SSA (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff: RICHARD B. THORNTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
THORNTON v. 46TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT JUDGES et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv01092
Defendant: 46TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT JUDGES, BRECKINRIDGE COUNTY ATTORNEY, BRECKINRIDGE COUNTY CIRCUIT CLERKS OFFICE and others
Plaintiff: RICHARD B. THORNTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MOSS et al v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 4:2008cv00141
Plaintiff: GERALDINE MOSS
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF INDIANA, STATE OF KENTUCKY and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Type: Other Statutes None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?