Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Louisiana et al v. Environmental Protection Agency et al
as 2:2023cv01714
Plaintiff:
State of Louisiana, State of Alaska, State of Arkansas and others
Defendant:
U S Environmental Protection Agency and Michael Regan
Intervenor Plaintiff:
State of California, California Water Resources Control Board, State of Colorado and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
State of Missouri v. Biden
as 23-30445
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of Missouri, State of Louisiana, Aaron Kheriaty and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., Vivek H. Murthy, Xavier Becerra and others
Amicus Curiae:
Children's Health Defense, Leland Stanford Junior University, Electronic Frontier Foundation and others
Alliance Hippocratic Medicine v. FDA
as 23-10362
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians & Gynecologists, American College of Pediatricians and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Food & Drug Administration, Robert M. Califf, Commissioner of Food and Drugs, Janet Woodcock, M.D., in her official capacity as Principal Deputy Commissioner, U.S. Food and Drug Administration and others
Intervenor:
Danco Laboratories, L.L.C.
Amicus Curiae:
State of New York, Ethics and Public Policy Center, Local Governments and others
Not Classified By Court:
240 Members of Congress and Human Coalition
Fund Texas Choice et al v. Paxton et al
as 1:2022cv00859
Plaintiff:
Fund Texas Choice, The North Texas Equal Access Fund, The Lilith Fund for Reproductive Equity and others
Defendant:
Ken Paxton, Susan R. Deski, Julie Renken and others
Amicus Curiae:
Physicians For Reproductive Health, State of California, State of Colorado and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
United States of America v. State of Texas
as 1:2021cv00796
Plaintiff:
United States Of America
Defendant:
State of Texas
Intervenor Defendant:
Erick Graham, Jeff Tuley, Mistie Sharp and others
Amicus Curiae:
State of Massachusetts, State of California, State of Colorado and others
Petitioner:
Felipe Gomez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 USA Plaintiff
Braidwood Management Inc. et al. v. Xavier Becerra et al.
as 4:2020cv00283
Plaintiff:
John Kelley, Kelley Orthodontics, Joel Starnes and others
Defendant:
Steven T. Mnuchin, Alex M. Azar II, Eugene Scalia and others
Amicus Curiae:
State of Illinois, State of California, State of Colorado and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Polansky et al v. Executive Health Resources Inc. et al
as 1:2018mc00331
Interested Party:
Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC
Defendant:
Executive Health Resources Inc.
Movant:
M.D., M.P.H. Jesse Polansky and United States of America
Plaintiff:
M.D., M.P.H. Jesse Polansky, The Commonwealth of Massachusetts, The Commonwealth of Virginia and others
Respondent:
Seton Medical Center
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
State of Nevada, et al v. U.S. Department of Labor, et al
as 17-41130
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STATE OF NEVADA, STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF ALABAMA and others
Defendant - Appellant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, WAGE AND HOUR DIVISION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, MARY ZIEGLER, in her official capacity as Assistant Administrator for Policy of the Wage and Hour Division and others
Movant - Appellant:
TEXAS AFL-CIO
State of Nevada, et al v. LABR, et al
as 16-41606
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STATE OF NEVADA, STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF ALABAMA and others
Defendant - Appellant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, THOMAS E. PEREZ, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, In his official capacity as United States Secretary of Labor, WAGE AND HOUR DIVISION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and others
Mitchell Williams v. Louisiana, et al
as 16-30980
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MITCHELL WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF LOUISIANA, ERIN DELANY, STATE OF ILLINOIS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
