Cases 1 - 10 of 17
TURNER v. SPRINGFIELD TERMINAL RAILWAY COMPANY et al
as 1:2020cv00194
Plaintiff:
KELLY TURNER
Defendant:
PAN AM RAILWAYS INC and SPRINGFIELD TERMINAL RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
HOLT v. SPRINGFIELD TERMINAL RAILWAY COMPANY
as 1:2018cv00245
Plaintiff:
GERALD HOLT
Defendant:
SPRINGFIELD TERMINAL RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PRINCIPATO v. SPRINGFIELD TERMINAL RAILWAY COMPANY
as 2:2016cv00073
Plaintiff:
RICHARD PRINCIPATO
Defendant:
SPRINGFIELD TERMINAL RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SHORT v. SPRINGFIELD TERMINAL RAILWAY COMPANY
as 2:2016cv00074
Plaintiff:
DEREK SHORT
Defendant:
SPRINGFIELD TERMINAL RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DIMAURO v. SPRINGFIELD TERMINAL RAILWAY COMPANY
as 2:2016cv00071
Plaintiff:
DONALD DIMAURO
Defendant:
SPRINGFIELD TERMINAL RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
NADEAU v. SPRINGFIELD TERMINAL RAILWAY COMPANY
as 2:2016cv00017
Plaintiff:
ROBERT N NADEAU
Defendant:
SPRINGFIELD TERMINAL RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00453
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
CANADIAN NATIONAL RAILWAY COMPANY v. SPRINGFIELD TERMINAL RAILWAY COMPANY et al
as 2:2012cv00024
Plaintiff:
CANADIAN NATIONAL RAILWAY COMPANY
Defendant:
SPRINGFIELD TERMINAL RAILWAY COMPANY and ABC COMPANIES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PAN AM SYSTEMS INC et al v. HARDENBERGH et al
as 2:2011cv00339
Plaintiff:
PAN AM SYSTEMS INC , SPRINGFIELD TERMINAL RAILWAY COMPANY and DAVID ANDREW FINK
Defendant:
CHALMERS HARDENBERG, CM HARDENBERG PA and ATLANTIC NORTHEAST RAILS AND PORTS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
CHASE v. SPRINGFIELD TERMINAL RAILWAY COMPANY
as 1:2009cv00558
Plaintiff:
KENNETH CHASE
Defendant:
SPRINGFIELD TERMINAL RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
