Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1151
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
US, et al v. JetBlue Airways Corporation, et al
as 24-1092
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and others
Defendant:
JETBLUE AIRWAYS CORPORATION and SPIRIT AIRLINES, INC.
Interested Party:
BOEING CO., UNITED AIRLINES, INC., SOUTHWEST AIRLINES CO. and others
Amicus Curiae:
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Littlefield, et al v. US Dept of the Interior, et al
as 23-1197
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID LITTLEFIELD, MICHELLE LITTLEFIELD, TRACY ACORD and others
Defendant / Appellee:
US DEPT OF THE INTERIOR, DEBRA HAALAND, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Interior, BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS, of the Department of the Interior of the United States of America and others
Stalcup v. Department of Defense Agency
as 22-1405
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS STALCUP
Defendant / Appellee:
US DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, Office of the Secretary of Defense of the United States of America
Interested Party:
JAMES J. SHERIDAN and JERRY KRILL
Fishman, et al v. Trump, et al
as 20-1868
Defendant / Appellee:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, PAUL LYNESS, Deputy Clerk, JUDGE INDIRA TALWANI and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEBORAH FISHMAN, individually and on behalf of minor D.J.P. and TAXPAYING CITIZENS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 20-1567
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
City of Providence, et al v. Warner Chilcott (US), LLC, et al
as 19-8026
Petitioner:
WARNER CHILCOTT SALES (US), LLC, WATSON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., WARNER CHILCOTT PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
KROGER COMPANY, MARY ALEXANDER, a resident citizen of the State of North Carolina, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, WALGREEN CO. and others
Respondent:
ELECTRICAL WORKERS 242 & 294 HEALTH & WELFARE FUND, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS LOCAL 1776 & PARTICIPATING EMPLOYERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, LABORERS INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NORTH AMERICA LOCAL 35 HEALTH CARE FUND, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated and others
Interested Party:
BAYER HEALTHCARE, LLC,, CAREMARK, LLC and CVS HEALTH CORPORATION
Defendant:
ALLERGAN, PLC, WARNER CHILCOTT HOLDINGS COMPANY III, LTD., LUPIN LTD. and others
Demos v. Barr, et al
as 19-1428
Defendant:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, STATE OF WASHINGTON, CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS
Defendant / Appellee:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and MICHAEL POMPEO, Secretary of State
Gustavsen, et al v. Alcon Laboratories, Inc., et al
as 17-2066
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GUSTAVSEN, JOSEPH CUGINI, DEMETRA COHEN and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ALCON LABORATORIES, INC., ALCON RESEARCH LTD., FALCON PHARMACEUTICALS LTD. and others
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICAN TORT REFORM ASSOCIATION, CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MANUFACTURERS and others
Silva-Ramirez, ex rel v. Hospital Espanol Auxilio Mutuo, et al
as 16-2043
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAMUEL DAVID SILVA-RAMIREZ, on behalf of United States of America
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES, ex rel
Defendant - Appellee:
HOSPITAL ESPANOL AUXILIO MUTUO DE PUERTO RICO, INC., SOCIEDAD ESPANOLA DE AUXILIO MUTUO Y BENEFICIENCIA DE PUERTO RICO, ENRIQUE FIERRES-GONZALEZ and others
Defendant:
MIGUEL ECHENIQUE-IPARRAGUIERRE, ADRIAN COLON-LARACUENTE, RAMON DELGADO-RUIBAL and others
Interested Party:
IVAN E. COLON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
