Cases 1 - 10 of 94
Arcello v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00447
Plaintiff:
Francis Arcello
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Elmoqaddem v. California, State of et al
as 2:2024cv10334
Plaintiff:
Sam Salaheddine Elmoqaddem
Defendant:
California, State of, Vincent Zurzolo, Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing and others
MacPherson v. Priest et al
as 1:2023cv00356
Plaintiff:
Katherine L. Lawrence and Katherine Louise MacPherson
Defendant:
Brian J. Priest and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Chilton v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv00188
Plaintiff:
Gene Le Victor Chilton
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Sims v. United States of America et al
as 1:2022cv00975
Plaintiff:
Montoyya Sims
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Postal Service, Michigan, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2679 Petition for Removal - Tort Claims Procedure
Cassaday #71417-509 v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv00783
Plaintiff:
Kevin Cassaday #71417-509
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Blocker v. Koenig et al
as 1:2022cv00726
Plaintiff:
RESTRICTED FILER Corey Blocker
Defendant:
Carol N. Koenig, Michigan, State of, Gretchen Whitmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00641
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Ramos-Gomez v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv00470
Plaintiff:
Jilmar Ramos-Gomez
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Cassaday #71417-509 v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv00393
Plaintiff:
Kevin Cassaday #71417-509
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
