Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01367
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 mn Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Valesquez v. United States Parole Commission
as 1:2020cv00583
Petitioner:
Jose Valesquez
Respondent:
United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mance v. United States Parole Commission
as 1:2016cv08749
Petitioner:
Victor Mance
Respondent:
United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mance v. United States Parole Commission
as 1:2016cv07249
Petitioner:
Victor Mance
Respondent:
United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Matthews v. Baltazar et al
as 1:2016cv01419
Petitioner:
Antonio Matthews
Respondent:
J. Baltazar and United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Maynard v. United States Parole Commission et al
as 1:2015cv09682
Plaintiff:
Charles E Maynard
Defendant:
United States Parole Commission and Juan Baltazar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hardy v. United States Parole Commission et al
as 9:2014cv01575
Petitioner:
Quintelle Hardy
Respondent:
United States Parole Commission and David Stallone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv02022
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv06456
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Fauntlery v. United States Parole Commission et al
as 1:2013cv04721
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Fauntlery
Defendant:
National Appeals Board, United States Parole Commission and United States Probation Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
