Cases 81 - 90 of 5,118
Wheatley v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00010
Petitioner:
Jayson Dwayne Wheatley
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Petlechkov v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00434
Plaintiff:
Dimitar Petlechkov
Defendant:
United States of America
Wheeler v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00417
Petitioner:
Marion Wheeler
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
OWENS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
CANDACE OWENS
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Other:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (NOTICE)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
DURHAM v. GARLAND et al
as 5:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Kenny Durham
Defendant:
MERRICK GARLAND, PETER LEARY and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00322
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
DAVIS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 7:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY DAVIS
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Other:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (NOTICE)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Diggs v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00007
Petitioner:
Maurice Antwain Diggs
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Payne v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00264
Plaintiff:
Dolford Payne
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0925 A Wrongful Denial of a Firearm
Vanella v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
Nicolas Vanella
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0925 A Wrongful Denial of a Firearm
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
