Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Razvan Rusovici v. Marcy Verduin, et al
as 24-10074
Plaintiff:
RAZVAN RUSOVICI
Defendant:
MARCY VERDUIN, in her official and individual capacity, DOE, DEFENDANTS 1-20 in their official and individual capacity and THE UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA BOARD OF TRUSTEES
Hamman v. University of Central Florida Board of Trustees, et al
as 6:2023cv00395
Plaintiff:
Al Hamman
Defendant:
University of Central Florida Board of Trustees, Alex Martins, Harold Mills and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00304
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1210
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv00547
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv00329
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00018
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
The University of Central Florida Board of Trustees v. Sportswear, Inc.
as 6:2020cv01817
Plaintiff:
The University of Central Florida Board of Trustees
Defendant:
Sportswear, Inc. d/b/a Prep Sportswear and Sportswear, Inc. doing business as Prep Sportswear
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Deppe v. The University of Central Florida Board of Trustees
as 6:2020cv01588
Defendant:
The University of Central Florida Board of Trustees
Plaintiff:
Denis Deppe and sdPhotonics LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2020cv01279
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
