Cases 1 - 10 of 19
New York Princess Cruises 2 LLC, as owner of the 119-foot passenger vessel "NAUTICAL EMPRESS" for Exoneratioin from or Limitation of Liability
as 1:2023cv09444
Petitioner:
New York Princess Cruises 2 LLC, as owner of the 119-foot passenger vessel "NAUTICAL EMPRESS" for Exoneratioin from or Limitation of Liability
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
In the Matter of the Complaint of Allan Mascia
as 2:2023cv05204
Petitioner:
Allan Mascia, as Owner of a 2003, 43-foot vessel named "IN THE RED" for Exoneration from or Limitation of Liability and Allan Mascia
In Re:
In the Matter of the Complaint of Allan Mascia
Claimant:
George Harned
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
In the Matter of the Complaint of Leif Neubauer
as 2:2023cv04112
Petitioner:
In the Matter of the Complaint of LEIF NEUBAUER, as Owner of a 1995, 38-foot vessel named "KRAKEN" for Exoneration from or Limitation of Liability
In Re:
In the Matter of the Complaint of Leif Neubauer
Counter Defendant:
Leif Neubauer
Claimant:
J.M.G. Distributors Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
In The Matter of The Complaint of FIRE ISLAND FERRIES INCORPORATED, as Owner of a 2003, 85-foot vessel named "FIRE" ISLANDER" for Exoneration from or Limitation of Liability
as 1:2022cv06036
Petitioner:
In The Matter of The Complaint of FIRE ISLAND FERRIES INCORPORATED, as Owner of a 2003, 85-foot vessel named "FIRE" ISLANDER" for Exoneration from or Limitation of Liability
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
In the Matter of the Complaint of Mike's Party Boat Inc.
as 2:2022cv01671
Petitioner:
In the Matter of the Complaint of Mike's Party Boat Inc., as Owner of a 1997, 78-foot vessel named "CAPTAIN LOU VII" for Exoneration from or Limitation of Liability and Mike's Party Boat Inc., as Owner of a 1997, 78-foot vessel named "CAPTAIN LOU VII" for Exoneration from or Limitation of Liability
In Re:
In the Matter of the Complaint of Mike's Party Boat Inc.
Claimant:
Sheon Dixon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
In the Matter of the Complaint of Michael Flynn v. Grauer
as 2:2021cv02919
Petitioner:
IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPLAINT OF MICHAEL FLYNN, as Owner of a 1997, 35-foot Recreational vessel, for Exoneration from or Limitation of Liability and Michael Flynn
Claimant:
Joan Grauer
In Re:
In the Matter of the Complaint of Michael Flynn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Percy et al v. Manhattan Telecommunications Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv02311
Defendant:
Manhattan Telecommunications Corporation, Milford Management, Opengate Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Albert E. Percy and Percy Jobs and Careers Corporation an IRC 501(c)(3) non-profit, as Class Representatives, Albert E. Percy and Percy Jobs and Careers Corporation
Respondent:
James M. Kernan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02102
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201
In the Matter of the Complaint of Francesco Distefano
as 2:2021cv01961
Petitioner:
Francesco Distefano, as Owner of a 2016, 39-Foot Recreational vessel, for Exoneration from or Limitation of Liability and Francesco Distefano
Respondent:
Strong's Marine, LLC, Strong's Marine, Inc., Strong's Water Club & Marina, LLC and others
Claimant:
Town of Southold, Megan Blanchard and Nicholas Soullas
In Re:
In the Matter of the Complaint of Francesco Distefano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
In the Matter of the Complaint of Peconic Jet Ski, LLC v. The Estate of Lisa Margaritis
as 2:2020cv05589
Petitioner:
In The Matter of The Complaint of Peconic Jet Ski, LLC as Owner of an 11-foot, Connelly 3D stand up paddle vessel for Exoneration from or Limitation of Liability and Peconic Jet Ski, LLC
Interested Party:
Peter Margaritis
In Re:
In the Matter of the Complaint of Peconic Jet Ski, LLC
Claimant:
The Estate of Lisa Margaritis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
