Cases 1 - 10 of 2,710
LANE v. WARDEN
as 2:2024cv00374
Petitioner:
DAVID HENRY LANE, JR.
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WELCHES v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv01634
Petitioner:
KENNETH ALLEN WELCHES
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hawkins v. State of Indiana
as 4:2024cv00068
Petitioner:
Alomandos Hawkins
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Praul v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00772
Petitioner:
Harlan Praul, Harlan Thomas Praul and Harlan T Praul
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CLAY v. WARDEN
as 3:2024cv00169
Petitioner:
DAMIAN CLAY
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CONNER v. FUNDERSOL et al
as 1:2024cv01614
Defendant:
COTTON, JOANNA PRIMEAU, WINGARD and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT CONNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bullock v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00768
Respondent:
Warden
Petitioner:
Corey A Bullock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Turner v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00618
Respondent:
Warden
Petitioner:
Akeem Turner
Unknown:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CANNON v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS WARDEN AT UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY -- TERRE HAUTE INDIANA et al
as 2:2024cv00439
Plaintiff:
GREGORY L. CANNON
Defendant:
WOLF, CASE MANAGER -- A-L UNIT and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS WARDEN AT UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY -- TERRE HAUTE INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Alvarez v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00765
Respondent:
Warden
Petitioner:
Alberto Alvarez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
