Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 28
In re: Synchrony Financial We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-1352
Defendant: Roy A. Guthrie, Richard C. Hartnick, Arthur W. Coviello, Jr. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Stiching Depository APG Fixed Income Credits Pool, Stiching Depository APG Developed Markets Equity Pool, Stichting Depository APG Fixed Income Credits Pool and others
Defendant / Appellee: Mizuho Securities USA LLC, R. Seelaus & Co., Inc., Blaylock Van, LLC and others
Plaintiff: Retail Wholesale Department Store Union Local 338 Retirement Fund, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, Maureen Aldridge, derivatively on behalf on Synchrony Financial and Jeffrey Gilbert, Derivatively on behalf of Synchrony Financial
Retail Wholesale Department Store Union Local 338 Retirement Fund v. Synchrony Financial et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv01818
Plaintiff: Retail Wholesale Department Store Union Local 338 Retirement Fund, Stichting Depositary APG Fixed Income Credits Pool and Stichting Depositary APG Developed Markets Equity Pool
Defendant: Brian M Doubles, Synchrony Financial, Margaret M Keane and others
Consolidated Defendant: Arthur W Coviello, Jr., Laurel J Richie, William W Graylin and others
Petitioner: Danica Pension, Livsforsikringsaktieselskab, Heavy & General Laborers Local 472 & 172 Pension, Annuity and Welfare Funds and KBC Asset Management NV
Consolidated Plaintiff: Jeffrey Gilbert and Maureen Aldridge
Altayyar v. Etsy, Inc.
as 17-1180
Plaintiff - Appellant: Saleh Altayyar, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Andrew Huang and Sarah Chang
Movant - Appellant: Mary M. Giltenan
Defendant - Appellee: Etsy, Inc., Chad Dickerson, Kristina Salen and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-3686
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv01987
Debtor: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Type: Bankruptcy Appeal
Stricker v. Coty Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00919
Plaintiff: Eugene Stricker
Defendant: Coty Inc., Michele Scannavini, Sergio Pedreiro and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
In Re: CitiGroup Inc. Bond Act
as 14-202
Plaintiff - Appellee: Louisiana Sheriffs' Pension and Relief Fund, On behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, Louisiana Municipal Police Employees' Retirement System, On behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, Minneapolis Firefighters' Relief Association and others
Defendant: Citigroup, Inc., Charles Prince, Sallie L. Krawcheck and others
Intervenor: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Objector - Appellant: Lexie L. Hopson and Michelle B. Hopson
In Re: General Electric Co. Se
as 13-3763
Plaintiff - Appellee: State Universities Retirement System of Illinois, Karen A. Christiansen, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Benson Duruaku and others
Appellant: Clark Hampe
Defendant: Jeffrey R. Immelt, Brackett B. Denniston, III, Pamela Daley and others
In Re: Refco Securities Litiga
as 13-2556
Debtor: In re: Utendahl Capital Partners, L.P.
Plaintiff - Appellee: American Financial International Group - Asia, LLC, Irv Kreitenberg, Steve Kreitenberg and others
Movant - Appellant: Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant - Appellee: Bennett Trust, Phillip R. Bennett, Leo R. Breitman and others
Shierry v. Facebook, Inc. et al Featured Case
as 1:2012cv07587
Plaintiff: Edward Shierry
Defendant: Facebook, Inc. , Mark Zuckerberg , David E. (sic) Ebersman and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?