Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Brickley et al v. GEICO Casualty Company et al
as 2:2022cv04030
Plaintiff:
Theo Brickley and Edyana Webster
Defendant:
GEICO Casualty Company, Esurance Insurance Company, Colonial County Mutual Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Bell et al v. Dow Chemical Company et al
as 3:2021cv00326
Plaintiff:
Patricia Richardson, David Whitehurst, Darleen Taylor and others
Defendant:
Larry Locicero, Dow Chemical Company, Michael Albano and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brignac et al v. Eagle U S 2 L L C et al
as 2:2015cv00711
Plaintiff:
Loretha Brignac , Wilson Roman Brignac , Lee Ester Brown and others
Defendant:
Eagle U S 2 L L C and David L. Ardoin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Abood et al v. Plant Performance Services, L.L.C. et al
as 2:2013cv02964
Defendant:
O'Brien's Response Management L.L.C., Plant Performance Services, L.L.C. doing business as P2S, Fluor Enterprises, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas S Abood, Latasha Acoo, John H Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Personal Injury
Lewis et al v. Skyline Corporation et al
as 2:2009cv06933
Defendant:
Skyline Corporation, Bechtel National Inc., CH2M Hill Construction, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
James Lewis, James Lewis, James Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Maggette et al v. BL Development Corp. et al
as 2:2007cv00181
Plaintiff:
Deonne Maggette, Myrtle Bailey, Theophilus "Theo" Cannon and others
Defendant:
BL Development Corp., Grand Casinos, Inc. and Caesars Entertainment, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Smith et al v. United States of America
as 3:2007cv00245
Plaintiff:
Theo C Smith, Sr, Theo C Smith, Sr, Theo C Smith, Sr and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
