Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Randal Mauderer v. Iowa Attorney General's Office, et al
as 16-3866
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Randal Mauderer
Defendant - Appellee:
Iowa Attorney General's Office, Sean Crawford, Associate Warden of Treatment, Larry Lipscomb, Associate Warden of Treatment and others
Stemmons v. Filippelli et al
as 4:2015cv00002
Plaintiff:
John William Stemmons
Defendant:
Frank Filippelli, Katherine Kerr, Theresa Sparks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Karla Gottschalk v. City and County of San Francis, et al
as 13-16690
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KARLA GOTTSCHALK
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, GAVIN NEWSOM, CECILIA CHANG and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-16690
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Wessel et al v. Mapes et al
as 4:2013cv00026
Plaintiff:
Patrick Wayne Wessel, Isaac Lopez Facio, Quentin Samson Washington and others
Defendant:
Terry Mapes, Theresa Sparks, Kristian Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wessel v. Ringler et al
as 4:2013cv00020
Plaintiff:
Patrick Wayne Wessel
Defendant:
Rusty Ringler, Terry Mapes, Theresa Sparks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv04531
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00231
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00231
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Harney v. San Francisco Police Department et al
as 3:2009cv03800
Plaintiff:
Mathew Douglas Harney
Defendant:
San Francisco Police Department, Theresa Sparks, Joe Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
