Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Rika Shimizu v. USDC-HI
as 22-70196
Not Classified By Court:
In re: RIKA SHIMIZU, MINA TAKAMURA, RIKUTA TAKAMURA and others
Petitioner:
RIKA SHIMIZU
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII
Thomas Bush v. J.D. Bush, et al
as 11-10072
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS K. BUSH
Defendant - Appellee:
J.D. BUSH, OSCAR L. BUSH, BUSH BROTHERS & COMPANY, subsidiaries and related trusts and others
Thomas E. Bush v. Foster Wheeler Co.
as PAE/2:10-CV-42805
Defendant:
Foster Wheeler Co.
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Bush
Bush v. Estate of J. D. Bush et al
as 1:2010cv02911
Plaintiff:
Thomas K. Bush
Defendant:
Estate of J. D. Bush, Estate of Oscar L. Bush, Bush Brothers & Company and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Maula v. Novak et al
as 1:2007cv12331
Plaintiff:
Alaae E Maula
Defendant:
Paul Novak, Denis Riordan, Emilio Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Diab v. Novak et al
as 1:2007cv12155
Plaintiff:
Jamal M. Diab
Defendant:
Paul Novak, Denis Riordan, Emilio T. Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Patel v. Chertoff et al
as 1:2007cv03501
Plaintiff:
Kokilaben Patel
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzalez, Mark B. Hansen and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Mikhail v. Novak et al
as 1:2007cv12041
Plaintiff:
Maha William Mikhail
Defendant:
Paul Novak, Denis Riordan, Emilio T. Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Chair v. Novak et al
as 1:2007cv11809
Defendant:
Paul Novak, Denis Riordan, Emilio T. Gonzalez and others
Plaintiff:
Ekramy Yosery Chair
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Mokhtar v. Novak et al
as 1:2007cv11712
Plaintiff:
Basem F. Mokhtar
Defendant:
Paul Novak, Denis Riordan, Emilio Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
