Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Rondon et al v. Mendocino County et al
as 4:2020cv07013
Plaintiff:
Skunkworx, LLC and Andres Rondon
Defendant:
Darren Brewster, Mendocino County, Matthew Kendall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Merriman v. Del Forintino et al
as 1:2015cv03250
Plaintiff:
Scott B. Merriman
Defendant:
Ricky Del Forintino, Craig Bernardi, Thomas Allman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hughes v. County of Mendocino et al
as 1:2015cv01794
Plaintiff:
Melodie Hughes
Defendant:
County of Mendocino, Sherfiff Thomas Allman, California Forensic Medical Group and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dustin v. Hagg et al
as 3:2013cv00203
Plaintiff:
Dale Owen Dustin
Defendant:
Melinda Hagg, Thomas Allman, Mendocino County Board of Supervisors and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fuller v. Allman
as 5:2012cv05138
Petitioner:
Kenneth Adrian Fuller
Respondent:
Thomas Allman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rosenbalm v. Allman et al
as 1:2011cv00306
Plaintiff:
Vincent Rosenbalm
Defendant:
Thomas Allman, Glenn Stark and Josh Cabral
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rosenbalm v. Allman et al
as 3:2011cv00306
Plaintiff:
Vincent Rosenbalm
Defendant:
Thomas Allman, Glenn Stark and Josh Cabral
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rosenbalm v. Foulk et al
as 3:2009cv02208
Plaintiff:
Vincent L. Rosenbalm
Defendant:
Edward Foulk, Glenn Stark, Thomas Allman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rosenbalm v. Brown et al
as 3:2008cv05600
Plaintiff:
Vincent Lee Rosenbalm
Defendant:
Ronald Brown, Thomas Allman and Ed Foulk
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Parker v. Nishiyama et al
as 3:2008cv04750
Plaintiff:
Memo Parker and Memo Parker
Defendant:
Robert Nishiyama, Peter Hoyle, Thomas Allman and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
