Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 50
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv06749
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mathon v. Barr
as 21-3038
Petitioner: Frantz Mathon
Respondent: William P. Barr, Attorney General of the United States, Thomas E. Feeley, in his official capacity as Field Office Director, Buffalo Field Office, U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01047
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv06602
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Thomas v. Garland
as 21-526
Respondent: Thomas Brophy, Facility Director Buffalo Federal Detention Facility, Robert M. Wilkinson, Acting United States Attorney General, Merrick B. Garland, Acting United States Attorney General and others
Petitioner: Harvel Thomas
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2020cv07105
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Thomas v. Barr
as 20-4029
Respondent: Thomas Brophy, Facility Director Buffalo Federal Detention Facility, Thomas E. Feeley, Field Office Director for Detention and Removal, Buffalo Field Office, Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, William P. Barr, Attorney General of the United States and others
Petitioner: Harvel Thomas
Thomas v. Barr et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2020cv06362
Respondent: Thomas Brophy, Thomas E. Feeley, William P. Barr and others
Petitioner: Harvel Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00670
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2020cv06311
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?