Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv08666
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Gardner v. New York Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital et al
as 1:2023cv03207
Plaintiff:
Helen Gardner
Defendant:
New York Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital, Lien-Khuong P. Tran, M.D., Karina M. Douza, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv07976
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv05751
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Ying v. Crystal Window & Door System, Ltd. et al
as 1:2021cv05100
Plaintiff:
Hou Hua Ying
Defendant:
Crystal Window & Door System, Ltd. and Thomas Chen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Chen et al v. Lu
as 1:2019cv06242
Plaintiff:
Thomas Chen, Huai'an Crystal Real Property Development Ltd. Co. and Crystal Window & Door System, Ltd.
Defendant:
Guo Liang Lu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
WowWee Group Limited et al v. ACI Group USA Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00460
Plaintiff:
WowWee Canada, INC., WowWee USA, INC. and WowWee Group Limited
Defendant:
Tissuesco Walnut Ltd., ACI Group USA Inc., Thomas Chen and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 la
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv02861
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Ramirez v. Crystal Window & Doors Systems, Ltd. et al
as 1:2014cv04810
Defendant:
Thomas Chen and Crystal Window & Doors Systems, Ltd.
Plaintiff:
Gerardo Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
