Cases 1 - 9 of 9
ANDERSON et al v. VISIONQUEST NATIONAL, LTD.
as 2:2024cv02181
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM ANDERSON, STANLEY BATTLE, JR., ALONDA BORDLEY and others
Defendant:
VISIONQUEST NATIONAL, LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Jacquin Clifford, et al v. Church Mutual Insurance Co
as 15-4154
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JACQUIN CLIFFORD, fka Cottrell, SANDRA WHITMAN, fka Cottrell, JOANNA COTTRELL and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CHURCH MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Clifford et al v. Church Mutual Insurance Company
as 2:2013cv00853
Plaintiff:
Jacquin Clifford , Sandra Whitman , Joanna Cottrell and others
Defendant:
Church Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
USA v. Michael Cottrell
as 12-30227
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL THOMAS COTTRELL, AKA Michael Thomas Ellis, AKA James Fuller, AKA William Paynter, AKA Ronald William Reddy
Michael Cottrell v. Daniel Jordan, et al
as 12-35437
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL THOMAS COTTRELL
Respondent - Appellee:
DANIEL JORDAN, DAVID GILMOUR, DENNIS C.W. SMITH and others
Cottrell v. Danial Jordan et al
as 1:2012cv00529
Petitioner:
Michael Thomas Cottrell
Respondent:
Jackson County Commissioner David Gilmour, Jackson County Commissioner Dennis CW Smith, Jackson County Transition Program Director Eric Guyer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
USA v. Michael Cottrell
as 12-30103
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL THOMAS COTTRELL, AKA Michael Thomas Ellis, AKA James Fuller, AKA William Paynter, AKA Ronald William Reddy
USA v. Michael Cottrell
as 11-30332
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL THOMAS COTTRELL
USA v. Michael Cottrell
as 08-30443
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL THOMAS COTTRELL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
