Cases filed in Maryland
Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01287
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Dewey, et al v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 1:2021cv01163
Plaintiff: Thomas D. Dewey and Darlene S. Dewey
Defendant: Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Aarts v. IThrive PH, Inc. et al
as 8:2019cv03430
Defendant: ITHRIVE PH, Inc. and IThrive Health, LLC
Plaintiff: Thomas D Aarts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00910
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
National Federation of the Blind v. U.S. AbilityOne Commission et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv02965
Plaintiff: The National Federation of the Blind
Defendant: Thomas D. Robinson, U.S. AbilityOne Commission and Tina Ballard
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Hurtado v. Gramercy Property Trust et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv02711
Defendant: Morgan Stanley & Co., LLC, Allan J. Baum, JEFFREY E. KELTER and others
Plaintiff: Raul Hurtado
Madry v. Gramercy Property Trust et al
as 1:2018cv01851
Plaintiff: Marek T. Madry
Defendant: Gramercy Property Trust, Allan J. Baum, Jamie Behar and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Franchi v. Gramercy Property Trust et al
as 1:2018cv01842
Plaintiff: Anthony Franchi
Defendant: Gramercy Property Trust, Charles E. Black, Gordon F. Dugan and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00165
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00135
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?