Cases 1 - 9 of 9
McMeans v. Butler et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00332
Plaintiff:
Thomas Kenyon McMeans
Defendant:
Reosha Butler, Steven T. Marshall and State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas McMeansIn re: Thomas McMeans
as 22-13067
Petitioner:
In re: THOMAS KENYON MCMEANS
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Thomas McMeans v. Attorney General of the State of Alabama, et al
as 22-12784
Petitioner / Appellant:
THOMAS KENYON MCMEANS
Respondent / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ALABAMA, COMMISSIONER, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF ALABAMA and others
McMeans v. Baldwin et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2021cv00385
Defendant:
Jeffery Baldwin and Steven T. Marshall
Plaintiff:
Thomas Kenyon McMeans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
KENYON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv07435
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
THOMAS KENYON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas Kenyon v. Commissioner of Social Securit
as 12-35685
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS KENYON
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Kenyon v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 1:2010cv01528
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Thomas Kenyon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of Commissioner's Final Decision
Kenyon v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 3:2008cv00247
Plaintiff:
Thomas Kenyon
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Clarendon America Insurance Company v. Spalding Construction Company, Inc. et al
as 2:2007cv00005
Plaintiff:
Clarendon America Insurance Company
Defendant:
Spalding Construction Company, Inc., Kathleen Bandiero, Jeffery L. Ranowel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
