Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Thomas Bates v. Jefferson Sessions, III, et al
as 18-2648
Plaintiff - Appellant: THOMAS L. BATES
Defendant - Appellee: JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, Attorney General of the United States, DANIEL R. BRANNIGAN, SUSAN BOGART and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-1590
Plaintiff - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Thomas Bates v. USA
as 16-3295
Plaintiff - Appellant: THOMAS L. BATES
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Thomas Bates v. DOJ, et al
as 16-3292
Plaintiff - Appellant: THOMAS L. BATES
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, NORTH CENTRAL REGION FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, S. JULIAN and others
Thomas Bates v. DOJ, et al
as 16-3037
Plaintiff - Appellant: THOMAS L. BATES
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, NORTH CENTRAL REGION FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, S. JULIAN and others
Thomas Bates v. DOJ, et al
as 16-2888
Plaintiff - Appellant: THOMAS L. BATES
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, NORTH CENTRAL REGION FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, S. JULIAN and others
CIRCLE SEVEN EL-RUKN et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 2:2016cv00204
Plaintiff: AMERICAN ORTHODOX ISLAM, THOMAS L. BATES and CIRCLE SEVEN EL-RUKN
Defendant: M. CAULTON, J. D. EDWARDS, M. JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
USA v. Thomas Bates
as 13-3331
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: THOMAS L. BATES
Thomas Bates v. Marvin Aspen
as 13-1462
Petitioner: THOMAS L. BATES
Respondent: MARVIN E. ASPEN
Party-in-Interest: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-2432
Petitioner - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?