Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 41
Cox v. Jisis et al
as 5:2009cv00122
Petitioner: Claude Cox
Respondent: Byron Jisis and Thomas L. Simpson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Darby v. Simpson
as 1:2009cv00079
Plaintiff: Daniel L. Darby
Defendant: Thomas L. Simpson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cox v. Jisis et al
as 6:2009cv00198
Petitioner: Claude Cox
Respondent: Byron Jisis and Thomas L. Simpson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cox v. Simpson et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2009cv00083
Plaintiff: Claude Cox
Defendant: Thomas L. Simpson, Greg Howard, Byron Jisis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowling v. Simpson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2009cv00157
Petitioner: Ronnie Lee Bowling
Respondent: Thomas L. Simpson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Demetrius Adams v. Thomas Simpson
as 09-5544
Petitioner - Appellant: DEMETRIUS MARQUISE ADAMS
Respondent - Appellee: THOMAS L. SIMPSON
Edward Bowles v. Thomas Simpson
as 09-5489
Petitioner - Appellant: EDWARD TED BOWLES
Respondent - Appellee: THOMAS L. SIMPSON
Wheeler v. Simpson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2009cv00336
Petitioner: Roger L. Wheeler and Roger L. Wheeler
Respondent: Thomas L. Simpson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robert Woodall v. Thomas Simpson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-5406
Petitioner - Appellee Cross-Appellant: ROBERT KEITH WOODALL
Respondent - Appellant Cross-Appellee: THOMAS L. SIMPSON, Warden
Parrish v. Simpson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2009cv00254
Petitioner: Melvin Lee Parrish and Melvin Lee Parrish
Respondent: Thomas L. Simpson
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?