Cases 31 - 40 of 41
Bowles v. Simpson
as 5:2008cv00003
Petitioner:
Edward Ted Bowles
Respondent:
Thomas L. Simpson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stopher v. Simpson
as 3:2008cv00009
Petitioner:
Vincent C. Stopher and Vincent C. Stopher
Respondent:
Thomas L. Simpson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jihad v. Simpson et al
as 5:2007cv00197
Plaintiff:
Wasim Islamic Jihad
Defendant:
Thomas L. Simpson and Terry Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Simpson
as 5:2007cv00392
Petitioner:
Demetrius Marquise Adams
Respondent:
Thomas L. Simpson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Rees et al
as 5:2007cv00180
Plaintiff:
Herbert R. Smith
Defendant:
John D. Rees, Thomas L. Simpson, Scott Haas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frye v. Rees et al
as 3:2007cv00527
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Frye
Defendant:
John D. Rees and Thomas L. Simpson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Kinser v. Simpson
as 1:2007cv00128
Petitioner:
Leroy Kinser
Respondent:
Thomas L. Simpson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Simmons v. Simpson
as 3:2007cv00313
Plaintiff:
Beoria Abraham Simmons and Beoria Abraham Simmons
Defendant:
Thomas L. Simpson and Thomas L. Simpson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shaw v. Simpson
as 5:2007cv00090
Petitioner:
Willie Lee Shaw, Jr.
Respondent:
Thomas L. Simpson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thompson v. Simpson
as 7:2007cv00050
Petitioner:
William Eugene Thompson and William Eugene Thompson
Respondent:
Thomas L. Simpson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
