Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Lopez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2013cv02068
Plaintiff:
Rodney Thomas Lopez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Lopez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2013at00902
Plaintiff:
Rodney Thomas Lopez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
USA v. Thomas Lopez
as 13-50921
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
THOMAS LOPEZ
Johnson v. Rivas Thomas Lopez et ano
as 1:2012cv05724
Defendant:
Astro Transport LLC and Rivas Thomas Lopez
Plaintiff:
Sandra Bigaud and Tenisha Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Lopez v. Astrue
as 1:2011cv04598
Plaintiff:
Thomas Lopez
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Lopez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2011cv01065
Plaintiff:
Thomas Lopez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Lopez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2011at00385
Plaintiff:
Thomas Lopez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Ladner et al v. Coachmen Industries, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv03986
Plaintiff:
Kevin Richard Ladner , Mike P. Ladner , Tiffany Nicole Ladner and others
Defendant:
Coachmen Industries, Inc., Coachmen Recreational Vehicle Company, LLC, Coachmen Recreational Vehicles of Georgia, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Ladner et al v. Coachmen Industries, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv07934
Plaintiff:
Kevin Richard Ladner, Mike P. Ladner, Tiffany Nicole Ladner and others
Defendant:
Coachmen Industries, Inc., Coachmen Recreational Vehicle Company, LLC, Coachmen Recreational Vehicles of Georgia, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
USA v. John Lopez
as 09-10543
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN THOMAS LOPEZ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
