Cases 1 - 10 of 182
Davis #200318 v. Washington et al
as 1:2023cv01109
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Davis #200318
Defendant:
Heidi E. Washington, L. Parish, Thomas Mackie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Powell v. MDOC, et al
as 20-1032
Defendant / Appellee:
[UNKNOWN] CHAPMAN, Psychologist, UNKNOWN PART(Y)(IES) #1, named as John Doe 1; Mental Health Unit Chief for Chippewa, THOMAS OSIER, Mental Health Director and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL LEON POWELL
Davis #200318 v. Mackie et al
as 1:2019cv00469
Defendant:
A. Haskey, W. Janicki, Unknown Turner and others
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Davis #200318
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andre Brown v. Terry Mackay, et al
as 19-1569
Defendant / Appellee:
T. BALL, Warden, TERRY MACKAY, Lieutenant, L. SHARP, Deputy Warden and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDRE C. BROWN
Michael Powell v. MDOC, et al
as 19-1565
Defendant / Appellee:
[UNKNOWN] HOLDEN, TIMOTHY P. BALL, Deputy Warden, [UNKNOWN] MUCHA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL POWELL
Jimmy Scott v. Thomas Mackie
as 19-1494
Petitioner / Appellant:
JIMMY LEE SCOTT
Respondent / Appellee:
THOMAS MACKIE, Warden
Nima Nassiri v. Thomas Mackie
as 19-1025
Petitioner / Appellant:
NIMA NASSIRI
Respondent / Appellee:
THOMAS MACKIE, Warden
Powell #484234 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2018cv00221
Defendant:
Unknown Mason, Unknown Curtis, Brian Majercyzk and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Leon Powell #484234
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Theriot #423068 v. Woods et al
as 2:2018cv00193
Defendant:
Unknown Velma, Unknown Phillips, Unknown Dalotts and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Dwayne Theriot #423068
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Theriot #423068 v. Woods et al
as 2:2018cv00092
Plaintiff:
Kevin Dwayne Theriot #423068
Defendant:
Jeffrey Woods, Unknown Huhta, Unknown Pesola and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
