Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00746
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Happle et al v. Ishbia et al
as 1:2024cv00089
Plaintiff: Thomas-Martin Happle and Carla Happle
Defendant: Mat Ishbia, James Daras, McCalla Raymer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Happle v. Wilson et al
as 1:2024cv00090
Plaintiff: Thomas-Martin Happle
Defendant: Kathleen Wilson, Doctor John Doe and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Happle v. Wubbenhorst et al
as 1:2023cv01402
Plaintiff: Thomas-Martin Happle
Defendant: Andrew Wubbenhorst, Kim Kassar and Criger's Towing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Happle v. D'Angelo
as 1:2023cv01399
Plaintiff: Thomas-Martin Happle
Defendant: Dana D'Angelo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Happle v. John
as 1:2023cv01401
Plaintiff: Thomas-Martin Happle
Defendant: Judge John Paparrazzo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Happle v. Wilson et al
as 1:2023cv01400
Plaintiff: Thomas-Martin Happle
Defendant: C. P. Wilson and M. Staton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
MARTIN v. MONSANTO COMPANY et al
as 2:2023cv20369
Plaintiff: THOMAS MARTIN
Defendant: MONSANTO COMPANY and JOHN DOES 1-50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Martin v. Iconic Brands, Inc.
as 1:2023cv01028
Plaintiff: Thomas Martin
Defendant: Iconic Brands, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Happle v. Sweeney et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv01612
Plaintiff: Thomas Martin-Happle and Thomas-Martin Happle
Defendant: Michael Sweeney, Jack McNiff, Paul Margiotta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?