Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Thomas More Law Center v. Kamala Harri
as 16-56902
Plaintiff - Appellant: THOMAS MORE LAW CENTER
Defendant - Appellee: KAMALA HARRIS, in her Official Capacity as Attorney General of the State of California
Thomas More Law Center v. Kamala Harris
as 16-56855
Plaintiff - Appellee: THOMAS MORE LAW CENTER
Defendant - Appellant: KAMALA HARRIS, in her Official Capacity as Attorney General of the State of California
Thomas More Law Center v. Kamala Harris We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv03048
Defendant: Kamala Harris
Plaintiff: Thomas More Law Center
Ave Maria Foundation, et al v. Kathleen Sebelius, et al
as 14-1310
Plaintiff - Appellee: AVE MARIA FOUNDATION, AVE MARIA COMMUNICATIONS, DOMINO'S FARMS PETTING FARM and others
Defendant - Appellant: KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, THOMAS E. PEREZ and others
The Ave Maria Foundation et al v. Sebelius et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv15198
Defendant: Kathleen Sebelius , United States Department of Health and Human Services , Thomas E. Perez and others
Plaintiff: The Ave Maria Foundation , Ave Maria Communications , Domino's Farms Petting Farm and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
THOMAS MORE LAW CENTER v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE
as 1:2011cv02152
Plaintiff: THOMAS MORE LAW CENTER
Defendant: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Thomas More Law Center, et al v. Barack Obama, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-2388
Plaintiff - Appellant: THOMAS MORE LAW CENTER, JANN DEMARS, JOHN CECI and others
Defendant - Appellee: BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, in his official capacity as President of the United States, KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, in her official capacity as Secretary, United States Department of Health and Human Services, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States and others
Thomas More Law Center et al v. President of the United States et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv11156
Plaintiff: Thomas More Law Center , Jann DeMars , John Ceci and others
Defendant: President of the United States, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Secretary of, Attorney General of the United States and others
Newdow, et al v. US Congress, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 06-16344
Plaintiff - Appellant: MICHAEL NEWDOW
Defendant - Appellee: PETER LEFEVRE, Law Revision Counsel, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOHN W. SNOW, Secretary of the Treasury and others
Defendant-intervenor - Appellee: PACIFIC JUSTICE INSTITUTE
Amicus Curiae: ATHEISTS AND OTHER FREETHINKERS, THOMAS MORE LAW CENTER, AMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE, United States Senator JIM DEMINT; United States Representatives ROBERT B. ANDERHOLT; W. TODD AKIN; ROSCOE G. BARTLETT, KEVIN BRADY; JOHN CAMPBELL; STEVE CHABOT; CHRIS FEENEY; VIRGINIA FOXX; TRENT FRANKS; SCOTT GARRETT; and others
Newdow, et al v. Rio Linda Union School Dist., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 05-17257
Plaintiff: MICHAEL NEWDOW, PAT DOE, DOECHILD and others
Plaintiff - Appellee: JAN ROE and ROECHILD-2
Defendant - Appellant: RIO LINDA UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT
Defendant: CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ELK GROVE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, SACRAMENTO CITY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT and others
Defendant-intervenor - Appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOHN CAREY, ADRIENNE CAREY and others
Amicus Curiae: PACIFIC JUSTICE, THE AMERICAN LEGION, TEXAS, IDAHO, OKLAHMOMA, ALABAMA, ALASKA, ARIZONA, ARKANSAS, CALIFORNIA, COLORADO, CONNECTICUT, DELAWARE, FLORIDA, GEORGIA, HAWAII, ILLINOIS, INDIANA, IOWA, KANSAS, KENTUCKY, LOUISIANA, MAINE, MARYLAND, MASSACHUSETTS, MICHIGAN, MINNESOTA, MISSISSIPPI, MIS and others
Amicus Curiae - Pending: EAGLE FORUM EDUCATION AND LEGAL DEFENSE FUND

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?