Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Rogers v. Reid et al
as 2:2023cv00636
Plaintiff:
Frankie Thomas Rogers
Defendant:
Gregory J Reid and Pamela Casey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rogers v. State of Alabama et al
as 2:2023cv00248
Plaintiff:
Frankie Thomas Rogers
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Blount County, Mark Moon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rogers v. Alabama, State of et al
as 2:2021cv01065
Plaintiff:
Frankie Thomas Rogers
Defendant:
Alabama, State of, Oneonta, City of, Charles Clifton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rogers v. Grandview Medical Center et al
as 2:2017cv02185
Plaintiff:
Frankie Thomas Rogers
Defendant:
Grandview Medical Center, Lefferage Robbins, Jr and Jackie Jay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. City of Hueytown et al
as 2:2016cv00113
Plaintiff:
Frankie Thomas Rogers
Defendant:
City of Hueytown, Ken Moore and Milton Barker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers et al v. Zimmer Inc et al
as 2:2013cv00066
Plaintiff:
Thomas Rogers and Martha Rogers
Defendant:
Zimmer Inc and Zimmer Holdings Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rogers v. State of Alabama et al
as 2:2012cv01120
Plaintiff:
Frankie Thomas Rogers
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Jefferson County, David Lichtenstein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. State of Alabama et al
as 2:2012cv00741
Plaintiff:
Frankie Thomas Rogers
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Jefferson County, David Lichtenstein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. City of Tarrant et al
as 2:2011cv02435
Plaintiff:
Frankie Thomas Rogers
Defendant:
City of Tarrant , United States, The and David Lichtenstein
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. Blount County et al
as 2:2011cv01446
Plaintiff:
Frankie Thomas Rogers
Defendant:
Blount County, Sherry Burns, Arrington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
