Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Doyle v. County of Suffolk et al
as 2:2023cv08871
Plaintiff:
Robert Doyle
Defendant:
County of Suffolk, James Burke, Thomas Spota and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2511 Wiretapping
Gross v. Sanchez et al
as 2:2020cv04873
Defendant:
Christopher McPartland, James Burke, Thomas Spota III and others
Plaintiff:
James Gross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Licausi v. Suffolk County et al
as 2:2020cv02884
Defendant:
Suffolk County, Police Department, Officer Bogliole and others
Plaintiff:
John Licausi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. County of Suffolk et. al.
as 2:2020cv01501
Defendant:
Ronald Tavares, Suffolk County Police Department, Suffolk County District Attorney's Office and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WHITE v. County Of Suffolk, New York et al
as 1:2020cv01501
Defendant:
RONALD TAVARES, Suffolk County District Attorney's Office, Asist. DA Laura Newcombe and others
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL WHITE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
R.S. et al v. Bellone et al
as 2:2017cv07435
Defendant:
Robert Biancavilla, Christopher McPartland, John Scott Prudenti and others
Plaintiff:
Debra Schaefer and R.S.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
O'Neal v. Spota
as 17-3334
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Brontie O'Neal
Defendant - Appellee:
Thomas Spota, Suffolk County Municipality, Town of East Hampton and others
O'Neal v. Spota et al
as 2:2017cv05023
Defendant:
Judge Telusni, Neith O'Hollopan, Thomas Spota and others
Plaintiff:
Brontie O'Neal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv04897
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Headley v. Spota et al
as 2:2017cv04853
Defendant:
Hon. Richard Ambro, Thomas Spota and Kate Wagner
Plaintiff:
Roxy Headley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
