Cases 1 - 10 of 33
WOODS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv05591
Plaintiff:
DARRION THOMAS WOODS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WOODS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv17308
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
THOMAS WOODS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wood v. Hardin
as 4:2020cv01376
Plaintiff:
Thomas Wood
Defendant:
Charles Tyler Hardin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
WOODS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv89337
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DARRION THOMAS WOODS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WOODS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv54399
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
THOMAS WOODS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WOOD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv36192
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
THOMAS WOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WOODS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv18842
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
THOMAS WOODS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WOODS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv82835
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
THOMAS WOODS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bennett et al v. City of Niagara Falls et al
as 1:2020cv00146
Plaintiff:
Mary Ellen Hohle, Albert Herbert, Angela Erin Tuchols and others
Defendant:
Miller Springs Remediation Management, Inc., Glenn Springs Holdings, Inc., CECOS International, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Wood et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv04898
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Thomas Wood and Tina Wood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
