Cases 1 - 10 of 585
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03325
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
TTI Global, Inc. v. Premier Staffing Solution, LLC et al.
as 3:2024cv00992
Plaintiff:
TTI Global, Inc.
Defendant:
Premier Staffing Solution, LLC, Blake Barton, Nicholas Antolini and others
Thompson v. Landmark Recovery of Euclid LLC
as 1:2024cv00934
Plaintiff:
Deona Thompson
Defendant:
Landmark Recovery of Euclid, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Thompson et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03027
Plaintiff:
David Thompson and Tina Thompson
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
GARRISON v. HAWKINS et al
as 2:2024cv02832
Petitioner:
Carlos Q Garrison
Respondent:
DANIEL HAWKINS, MICHAEL RUCKER, MATTHEW J. THOMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Thompson v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02594
Plaintiff:
Bobby Thompson
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Thompson v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02510
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Thompson
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Thompson v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02509
Plaintiff:
Angela Thompson
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Thompson v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65553
Plaintiff:
James D. Thompson
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02446
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
