Cases 1 - 10 of 16
RADFORD v. THOMSON
as 1:2021cv02173
Plaintiff:
CHARLES HORACE RADFORD
Defendant:
THOMSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cobb v Hyett et al
as 3:2020cv00623
Defendant:
Powell, Thomson, Hyett and others
Plaintiff:
Malcom D Cobb, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COBB v. HYETT et al
as 1:2020cv01816
Defendant:
POWELL, THOMSON, HYETT and others
Plaintiff:
MALCOM D. COBB, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BUCHANAN v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2017cv02690
Defendant:
WARDEN DICK BROWN, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MIFFLEN and others
Plaintiff:
EDDY BUCHANAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BUCHANAN v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2017cv00123
Defendant:
WARDEN DICK BROWN, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MIFFLEN and others
Plaintiff:
EDDY BUCHANAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOORE v. PETTY et al
as 2:2015cv00263
Defendant:
GARLAND, GIBBY, SGT. JOYNER and others
Plaintiff:
GARGANUS T. MOORE
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOORE v. FISCHER et al
as 2:2015cv00260
Defendant:
S. FISCHER, GARLAND, GIBBY and others
Plaintiff:
GARGANUS T. MOORE
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOODS v. COOKE et al
as 1:2014cv00079
Defendant:
NURSE CLARK, C. COOKE, OFFICER CULVAHOUSE and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WOODS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sir Oscar Guillen Sr v. Haley et al
as 2:2013cv00105
Plaintiff:
Oscar Guillen, Sr
Defendant:
Haley , Fields , Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
JOHNSON v. LEMMON et al
as 2:2013cv00069
Defendant:
ADAMS, S. ARONLD, BARNETT and others
Plaintiff:
DARNELL LEVON JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
