Cases 1 - 10 of 418
Watson et al v. Thor Motor Coach
as 5:2024cv00788
Plaintiff:
Mark D Watson and Mary E Watson
Defendant:
Thor Motor Coach, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
McClure v. Thor Motor Coach, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01188
Plaintiff:
Theresa E. McClure
Defendant:
Thor Motor Coach, Inc. and Pan Pacific RV Centers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Otake v. Thor Motor Coach, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00986
Plaintiff:
Kelly Otake
Defendant:
Thor Motor Coach, Inc. and Berryland Motors, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Clarence Martin, et al v. Thor Motor Coach, Inc.
as 24-1574
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE MARTIN and TERRI MARTIN
Defendant:
THOR MOTOR COACH, INC.
Clarence Martin, et al v. Thor Motor Coach, Inc.
as 24-1553
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE MARTIN and TERRI MARTIN
Defendant:
THOR MOTOR COACH, INC.
Baez v. Thor Motor Coach Inc
as 3:2024cv00098
Plaintiff:
Mr. David Baez and David Baez
Defendant:
Thor Motor Coach Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Piper et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 3:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
Mary A Piper and Thomas W Loveless
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company, Thor Industries Inc, Camping World RV Sales, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Nagel et al v. Thor Motor Coach, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
John Nagel and Melinda Nagel
Defendant:
Thor Motor Coach Inc and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Lee v. Thor Motor Coach Inc
as 3:2024cv00252
Defendant:
Valerie Kay Lee and Thor Motor Coach Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Jenkins v. Thor Motor Coach, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00249
Plaintiff:
Audra Jenkins
Defendant:
Thor Motor Coach, Inc. and Camping World RV Sales, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
