Cases 1 - 10 of 11
DENNIS, JR. v. ALISSA PIERSON DENNIES ESTATE ET AL. et al
as 2:2024cv00964
Plaintiff:
JAMES ALOYSIUS DENNIS, JR.
Defendant:
ALISSA PIERSON DENNIES ESTATE ET AL., JAMAUSHIREE DENNIS ESTATE ST AL., MIAH RENEE DENNIS ESTATE ET AL. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01746
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00183
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Dortch v. York County Children Youth and Families et al
as 1:2017cv01703
Plaintiff:
Frank Jerrid Dortch
Defendant:
York County Children Youth and Families, Paul Thorne , Irene Franzis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nieves v. Thorne et al
as 3:2016cv01912
Plaintiff:
Luis Nieves
Defendant:
Ron Thorne, Nicole Johannes and Paul Tomczyk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00566
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Grayson v. DeWitt et al
as 1:2015cv00453
Plaintiff:
Louis G. Grayson
Defendant:
Matthew DeWitt , Paul Thorne , Christopher Roosen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01244
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SIV et al v. THORN et al
as 2:2012cv00046
Plaintiff:
SOPHAL SIV , TONY KOAM , SOYITHA SIV and others
Defendant:
THORN , THOMAS REHIEL , POLICE OFFICERS JOHN DOE 1-4 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOSS v. CHEYNEY UNIVERSITY
as 2:2011cv01787
Plaintiff:
SUNKING MOSS
Defendant:
CHEYNEY UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA, MICHELLE HOWARD-VITAL, SHARON THORN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
