Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Samuel et al v. City of Houston, Texas et al
as 4:2022cv02900
Plaintiff:
Delores Samuel, Kyle Samuel and Maya Thorn
Defendant:
Tx. City Of Houston, K Drey, John Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv02704
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Perry v. Christian, et al
as 4:2019cv04757
Defendant:
Andrew Wheeler, Wayne Christian, David A Scott and others
Plaintiff:
Lee Perry
Interested Party:
Larry Johnson, LaToya Thorne, Taurus K. Dearman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv01273
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00026
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez v. The City of Grand Prairie et al
as 3:2015cv00718
Plaintiff:
Victor Rodriguez
Defendant:
The City of Grand Prairie , Jorja Clemson , Jim Swafford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00614
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Thorne v Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County, (METRO) et al
as 4:2013cv02997
Defendant:
Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County, (METRO) and Thomas C. Lambert
Plaintiff:
David L Thorne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00536
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Sanford et al v. Thorn et al
as 3:2012cv00252
Plaintiff:
George Sanford, III and Janice Hendley
Defendant:
John Thorn , Arthur Lee , Manual Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
