Cases 21 - 27 of 27
Thrivent Financial for Lutherans v. Davis et al
as 1:2011cv01106
Plaintiff:
Thrivent Financial for Lutherans
Defendant:
Daniel Davis and William A Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00853
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Thrivent Financial for Lutherans v. Chicago Title Land Trust Company, as successor trustee to LaSalle National Bank, as successor trustee to American National Bank and Trust Company of Chicago, as Trustee under Trust Agreement dated Nov et al
as 1:2010cv04592
Plaintiff:
Thrivent Financial for Lutherans
Defendant:
Chicago Title Land Trust Company, as successor trustee to LaSalle National Gank, as successor trustee to American National Bank and Trust Company of Chicago, as Trustee under Trust Agreement dated Nov, Apex Investment Associates Inc, Village of Mundelein, Illinois and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thrivent Financial For Lutherans v. Liefer et al
as 3:2009cv00483
Plaintiff:
Thrivent Financial For Lutherans
Defendant:
Richard Liefer, Hulda Alice Yud Revocable Intervivos Trust and Hulda A. Yud Family Trust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
BOXDORFER v. THRIVENT FINANCIAL
as 1:2009cv00109
Plaintiff:
MARVIN ANTON BOXDORFER
Defendant:
THRIVENT FINANCIAL, THRIVENT FINANCIAL and Thrivent Financial for Lutherans
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Thrivent Financial For Lutherans v. Rath et al
as 3:2008cv50231
Plaintiff:
Thrivent Financial For Lutherans and Thrivent Financial For Lutherans
Defendant:
David Rath, Vanya Moritz, Thomas Rath and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Thrivent Financial For Lutherans v. Petersen et al
as 1:2008cv00079
Plaintiff:
Thrivent Financial For Lutherans and Thrivent Financial For Lutherans
Defendant:
Audrey Petersen, Arthur Petersen, Vaughn Petersen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
