Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Cumbie v. Tibbles et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv01090
Defendant: Tibbles Property Solutions, LLC, Mark Tibbles and Mark Tibbles Enterprises, LLC
Plaintiff: Kaitlyn Cumbie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021at00558
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
(PC) Oliver v. Flamm et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv02661
Plaintiff: Anthony W. Oliver
Defendant: J. Alarado, M. Tibbles, G. Calderon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Glenn Tibble, et al v. Edison International, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 18-55974
Plaintiff - Appellant: GLENN TIBBLE, as representative of a class of similarly situated persons, and on behalf of the Plan, WILLIAM BAUER, as representative of a class of similarly situated persons, and on behalf of the Plan, WILLIAM IZRAL, as representative of a class of similarly situated persons, and on behalf of the Plan and others
Appellant: SCHLICHTER BOGARD & DENTON LLP, Class Counsel and Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs
Defendant - Appellee: EDISON INTERNATIONAL, EDISON INTERNATIONAL BENEFITS COMMITTEE, FKA Southern California Edison Benefits Committee, EDISON INTERNATIONAL TRUST INVESTMENT COMMITTEE and others
Wilkins v. Tibbles et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv02196
Plaintiff: Timothy D Wilkins
Defendant: M Tibbles and R Slater
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Men Nguyen v. David Tibbles et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv04023
Plaintiff: Men Nguyen
Defendant: Ocean Angel IV and David Tibbles
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Tibbles v. Puget Sound Electrical Workers Pension Plan et al
as 2:2012cv00559
Plaintiff: Dave C. Tibbles
Defendant: Puget Sound Electrical Workers Pension Plan and Board of Trustees of the Puget Sound Electrical Workers Pension Plan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Glenn Tibble, et al v. Edison International, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-56628
Plaintiff - Appellant: GLENN TIBBLE, as representative of a class of similarly situated persons, and on behalf of the Plan, WILLIAM BAUER, as representative of a class of similarly situated persons, and on behalf of the Plan, WILLIAM IZRAL, as representative of a class of similarly situated persons, and on behalf of the Plan and others
Defendant - Appellee: EDISON INTERNATIONAL, THE EDISON INTERNATIONAL BENEFITS COMMITTEE, FKA The Southern California Edison Benefits Committee, EDISON INTERNATIONAL TRUST INVESTMENT COMMITTEE and others
Glenn Tibble, et al v. Edison International, et al
as 10-56415
Plaintiff - Appellee: GLENN TIBBLE, as representative of a class of similarly situated persons, and on behalf of the Plan, WILLIAM BAUER, as representative of a class of similarly situated persons, and on behalf of the Plan, WILLIAM IZRAL, as representative of a class of similarly situated persons, and on behalf of the Plan and others
Defendant - Appellant: EDISON INTERNATIONAL, THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON BENEFITS COMMITTEE, incorrectly named The Edison International Benefits Committee, EDISON INTERNATIONAL TRUST INVESTMENT COMMITTEE and others
Glenn Tibble, et al v. Edison International, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-56406
Plaintiff - Appellant: GLENN TIBBLE, as representative of a class of similarly situated persons, and on behalf of the Plan, WILLIAM BAUER, as representative of a class of similarly situated persons, and on behalf of the Plan, WILLIAM IZRAL, as representative of a class of similarly situated persons, and on behalf of the Plan and others
Defendant - Appellee: EDISON INTERNATIONAL, THE EDISON INTERNATIONAL BENEFITS COMMITTEE, FKA The Southern California Edison Benefits Committee, EDISON INTERNATIONAL TRUST INVESTMENT COMMITTEE and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?