Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv00255
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Randall Houseman v. Sherman et al
as 1:2017cv01617
Plaintiff:
Randall Houseman
Defendant:
Stu Sherman, J. Odle, E. Hennesay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andre Lamont Swafford v. Armenta Tiggs-Brown et al
as 2:2017cv07568
Plaintiff:
Andre Lamont Swafford
Defendant:
Armenta Tiggs-Brown and Armenta Tiggs-Brown
Darnell Black v. A. Tiggs-Brown
as 2:2017cv04893
Plaintiff:
Darnell Black, Sr
Defendant:
A. Tiggs-Brown
William Brandstatt v. California Substance Abuse and, et al
as 14-15025
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM HUBERT LOYD BRANDSTATT
Defendant - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA SUBSTANCE ABUSE AND TREATMENT FACILITY, STATE PRISON MEDICAL STAFF, ANTHONY ENENMOH and others
William Brandstatt v. California Substance Abuse and, et al
as 13-17201
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM HUBERT LOYD BRANDSTATT
Defendant - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA SUBSTANCE ABUSE AND TREATMENT FACILITY, STATE PRISON MEDICAL STAFF, ANTHONY ENENMOH and others
Bussiere v. Kokor et al
as 1:2013cv01565
Plaintiff:
Arthur T. Bussiere
Defendant:
W. Kokor, Hashemi, Tiggs Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brandstatt v. California Substance Abuse and Treatment Facility, et al.
as 1:2013cv00434
Plaintiff:
William Hubert Loyd Brandstatt
Defendant:
California Substance Abuse and Treatment Facility, State Prison Medical Staff, Anthony Enenmoh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gebr Tigges GMBH & Co KG et al v. EYS Metal Sanayi Ve Ticaret LTD. STI et al
as 2:2007cv01673
Plaintiff:
Gebr Tigges GMBH & Co KG and Fan Separator GMBH
Defendant:
EYS Metal Sanayi Ve Ticaret LTD. STI and Daritech Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Tiggs v. Curry et al
as 4:2007cv02620
Plaintiff:
Abraham T. Tiggs
Defendant:
B. Curry, R.E. Compton, K. Eifert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
