Cases 31 - 40 of 42
Sullivan et al v. City of Sarasota
as 8:2014cv00710
Plaintiff:
Bobby Sullivan , Carole Barker , Jeanne Belluci and others
Defendant:
City of Sarasota
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tillery v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2014cv00112
Petitioner:
Jeremiah Tillery
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tillery v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2014cv00056
Petitioner:
Jeremiah Tillery
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00127
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Tillery v. United States of America
as 3:2013cv00051
Petitioner:
Warren Anthony Tillery
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Tillery v. Tran et al
as 6:2009cv00951
Plaintiff:
Kenneth R. Tillery
Defendant:
Officer Tran and Officer Flounoy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2009cv80572
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Tillery v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2009cv00095
Petitioner:
Kenneth Ray Tillery
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Tillery v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2008cv02260
Petitioner:
Kenneth Ray Tillery
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Tillery v. Tate et al
as 6:2008cv00592
Plaintiff:
Kenneth R. Tillery
Defendant:
Sgt. Tate, Sgt. Flonnery and Sgt. Keenen
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
