Cases 41 - 50 of 71
Tillman et al v. Auxilium Pharmaceuticals Inc et al
as 1:2014cv08021
Plaintiff:
Robert Tillman and Ocile Tillman
Defendant:
Auxilium Pharmaceuticals Inc. and D P T Laboratories Ltd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stanley Tillman v. United States of America
as 3:2014cv50225
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Stanley Tillman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Tillman v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv10175
Plaintiff:
Mondonza Tillman
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tillman v. Atchison et al
as 3:2013cv01125
Plaintiff:
Joseph Eddie Tillman
Defendant:
Michael Atchison, Richard Harrington, Major Hasemeyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tillman v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc et al
as 3:2013cv50528
Plaintiff:
Rosemary Tillman
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc and Boehringer Ingelheim International GMBH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Tillman v. Edwards et al
as 1:2013cv02383
Plaintiff:
Joseph E. Tillman
Defendant:
John Edwards, John Doe, Jane Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Helfrich v. City of Collinsville et al
as 3:2012cv01178
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Helfrich
Defendant:
City of Collinsville and Luke Tillman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv05752
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Tillman v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 1:2012cv04977
Plaintiff:
Stephen Tillman
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Liggins v. Astrue
as 1:2012cv04010
Plaintiff:
Tillman Liggins
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 425 Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
