Cases 51 - 60 of 73
Melvin Johnson v. James LeBlanc, et al
as 13-30530
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MELVIN JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES M. LEBLANC, TIM KEITH, CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA and others
David Stapleton v. Correction Corp. of America, et al
as 13-30388
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID LYNN STAPLETON
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTION CORPORATION OF AMERICA, TIM KEITH, NICOLE WALKER and others
Harris v. Keith et al
as 1:2013cv00750
Plaintiff:
Justin Harris
Defendant:
Tim Keith, Mary Harris, Mona Heyse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hardy v. Corrections et al
as 1:2013cv00695
Plaintiff:
James Stafon Hardy
Defendant:
Dept of Corrections, Tim Keith, T Poe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lay v. Keith
as 2:2013cv00287
Plaintiff:
Richard Lay
Defendant:
Tim Keith
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Washington v. Keith et al
as 1:2013cv00381
Plaintiff:
Meshaun Washington
Defendant:
Tim Keith, Kevin Jorden and Gary Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. LeBlanc et al
as 1:2012cv03145
Plaintiff:
Melvin Johnson
Defendant:
James M LeBlanc, Tim Keith, Corrections Corp of America and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dobbins v. Keith et al
as 1:2012cv03046
Plaintiff:
Michael Dobbins
Defendant:
Tim Keith, Nicole Walker, James LeBlanc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. C C A of Tennessee L L C et al
as 1:2012cv03005
Plaintiff:
Frederick King
Defendant:
C C A of Tennessee L L C, Tim Keith, Adam Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hughes v. Keith
as 2:2012cv02841
Plaintiff:
Randy Hughes
Defendant:
Tim Keith
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
