Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Ruchell Magee v. USDC-SAC
as 20-70835
Not Classified By Court:
J. ENRIQUEZ, In re: RUCHELL CINQUE MAGEE, TIMOTHY A. REARDON and others
Petitioner:
RUCHELL CINQUE MAGEE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Ruchell Magee v. Steven Arkowitz, et al
as 20-15384
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RUCHELL CINQUE MAGEE
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY A. REARDON, J. ENRIQUEZ and STEVEN ARKOWITZ
(PC) Magee v. Arkowitz et al
as 2:2019cv00172
Plaintiff:
Ruchell Cinque Magee and Ruchell Cinque Magee- PREFILING ORDER
Defendant:
Steven Arkowitz, Timothy A. Reardon and J. Enriquez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Magee v. Director California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 3:2018cv04518
Plaintiff:
Ruchell Cinque Magee
Defendant:
Timothy A. Reardon and Director California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Magee v. Director California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2018cv01562
Plaintiff:
Ruchell Cinque Magee
Defendant:
Director California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and Timothy A. Reardon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Magee v. Rogers et al
as 3:2018cv02873
Plaintiff:
Ruchell Cinque Magee
Defendant:
Yvonne G. Rogers and Timothy A. Reardon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reardon v. Olson
as 0:2018cv60428
Plaintiff:
Timothy Patrick Reardon
Defendant:
John K. Olson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Magee v. Reardon
as 3:2018cv00672
Plaintiff:
Ruchell Cinque Magee
Defendant:
Timothy A. Reardon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-11834
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2015cv62509
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
