Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Timothy Dunlap v. David Paskett
as 22-3776
Petitioner / Appellant:
TIMOTHY ALAN DUNLAP
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID PASKETT, Warden
In re: Bennie Adams, et al v. Richard Michael DeWine, et al
as 21-3330
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DOUGLAS L. COLEY, DENNY OBERMILLER, JASON ROBB and others
Intervenor / Appellee:
VON CLARK DAVIS, CALVIN MCKELTON, ASHFORD THOMPSON and others
Defendant / Appellant:
ANNETTE CHAMBERS-SMITH, Director, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections, EDWIN C. VOORHIES, JR., Managing Director of Operations, ODRC, MIKE DEWINE, Governor, State of Ohio and others
Plaintiff:
BENNIE ADAMS
Not Classified By Court:
In re: OHIO EXECUTION PROTOCOL LITIGATION
Dunlap v. I.M.S.I., et al.
as 1:2020cv00555
Plaintiff:
Timothy Alan Dunlap
Defendant:
Dr. Campbell and IMSI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunlap v. O'Connor
as 1:2020cv00273
Plaintiff:
Timothy Alan Dunlap
Defendant:
Sandra Day O'Connor and Sandra Day OConnor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunlap v. Ramirez et al
as 1:2017cv00495
Plaintiff:
Timothy Alan Dunlap
Defendant:
Ramirez and Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Angelo Fears, et al v. John Kasich, et al
as 16-3149
:
In re: OHIO EXECUTION PROTOCOL LITIGATION
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANGELO FEARS, RICHARD BAYS, ALVA E. CAMPBELL, JR. and others
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN KASICH, Governor, State of Ohio, GARY C. MOHR, Director, ODRC, DONALD MORGAN, Warden, Southern Ohio Correctional Facility and others
Dunlap v. Frick
as 1:2013cv00299
Plaintiff:
Timothy Alan Dunlap
Defendant:
Dennis Frick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Timothy Dunlap v. Ted Strickland, et al
as 09-4314
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY ALAN DUNLAP
Defendant - Appellee:
TED STRICKLAND and HEATHER GOSSILIER
Dunlap v. Strickland et al
as 2:2009cv00100
Plaintiff:
Timothy Alan Dunlap
Defendant:
Ted Strickland and Heather Gossilier
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
