Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Copeland v. Blalock et al
as 4:2018cv02714
Defendant: Timothy M. Preischel, Curtis D. Bridges, M. Blalock and others
Plaintiff: Clyde Copeland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ortiz v. Blalock et al
as 4:2018cv01826
Plaintiff: Joshua Ortiz
Defendant: M. Blalock, Charles H. Landis, Timothy M. Preischel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tawe v. Ferguson et al
as 4:2017cv03420
Plaintiff: Richard N Tawe
Defendant: Jared M Ferguson, Deshael I Wright, Desmund V Vaughn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tawe v. Davis et al
as 4:2017cv03469
Plaintiff: Richard N. Tawe
Defendant: Lorie Davis, Bryan Collier, Oliver J. Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tawe v. Roesler et al
as 4:2017cv03442
Plaintiff: Richard N. Tawe
Defendant: Michael Roesler, Charles H Landis, Keith Gorsuch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tawe v. Roesler et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2017cv03436
Plaintiff: Richard N Tawe
Defendant: Michael A Roesler, Charles H Landis, Keith Gorsuch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tawe v. Roesler We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2017cv03404
Plaintiff: Richard N. Tawe
Defendant: Michael A Roesler, Charles H. Landis, Robert J. Jenkins, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Crain v. Davis et al
as 4:2017cv02772
Petitioner: Pearlie Mae Crain
Defendant: Lorie Davis, Lincoln E. Clark, Timothy M. Preischel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Darrell Harper v. State of Texas, et al
as 16-40099
Plaintiff - Appellant: DARRELL J. HARPER
Defendant - Appellee: STATE OF TEXAS, TIMOTHY M. PREISCHEL and KEVIN B. SMITH
Harper v. State of Texas et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2015cv01016
Plaintiff: Darrell J Harper
Defendant: State of Texas, Timothy M Preischel and Kevin B Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?