Cases 31 - 40 of 84
Navarro v. McCarthy
as 6:2020cv06094
Petitioner:
Vangie Navarro
Respondent:
Supt. Timothy McCarthy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Navarro v. McCarthy
as 9:2020cv00059
Petitioner:
Vangie Navarro
Defendant:
Supt. Timothy McCarthy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01690
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Ferguson v. New York State Department of Corrections et al
as 9:2019cv01405
Plaintiff:
Eric Ferguson and Eric R. Ferguson
Defendant:
Timothy McCarthy, M.D. John Doe and New York State Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James McCarthy v. USDC-CAOAK
as 19-73038
Not Yet Classified:
JIMMIE L. WILSON III, Assistant District Attorney, Alameda County District Attorney and NANCY E. O'MALLEY, District Attorney of Alameda County
Petitioner:
JAMES TIMOTHY MCCARTHY
Not Classified By Court:
In re: JAMES TIMOTHY MCCARTHY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND
Van Hooser v. McCarthy
as 9:2019cv01143
Respondent:
Timothy McCarthy
Petitioner:
Floyd Van Hooser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brady v. McCarthy
as 1:2019cv01280
Respondent:
Timothy McCarthy
Petitioner:
Bashan Brady
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brady v. McCarthy
as 9:2019cv01065
Respondent:
Timothy McCarthy
Petitioner:
Bashan Brady
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Marshall v. McCarthy
as 9:2019cv01003
Respondent:
Timothy McCarthy
Petitioner:
James D. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ferguson v. New York State Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2019cv06625
Defendant:
New York State Department of Corrections, Deputy of Security John Doe and Superintendent Timothy McCarthy
Plaintiff:
Eric R. Ferguson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
