Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Banks v. Hornak, et al
as 17-1342
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK H. BANKS
Defendant - Appellee:
MARK HORNAK, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, MICHAEL POMPEO, Director of the Central Intelligence Agency and others
Banks v. Langford, et al
as 17-1320
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK H. BANKS
Defendant - Appellee:
SEAN LANGFORD, JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, ROBERT WERNER and others
Banks v. Werner, et al
as 17-1322
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK H. BANKS
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT WERNER, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, MICHAEL POMPEO, Director of the Central Intelligence Agency and others
Banks v. FBI, et al
as 17-1321
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK H. BANKS
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, TIMOTHY PIVNICHNY, ROBERT WERNER and others
Banks v. Hornak, et al
as 17-1189
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK H. BANKS
Defendant - Appellee:
MARK HORNAK, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, MICHAEL POMPEO, Director of the Central Intelligence Agency and others
Banks v. Eddy, et al
as 17-1197
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK H. BANKS
Defendant - Appellee:
CYNTHIA REED EDDY, MARK HORNAK, TIMOTHY PIVNICHNY and others
Banks v. FBI, et al
as 17-1184
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK H. BANKS
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, TIMOTHY PIVNICHNY, ROBERT WERNER and others
Banks v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
as 1:2016cv10938
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation, Timothy Pivnichny, Robert Werner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Langford et al
as 1:2016cv10973
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Sean Langford, Loretta Lynch, Robert Werner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Werner et al
as 1:2016cv10964
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Robert Werner, Federal Bureau Investigations, John Brennan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
