Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Brown v. Collier et al
as 4:2020cv04078
Defendant:
Lieutenent Brenda R. Phillips, Skylar A. Dolphin, Sgt. Vandell Dawson and others
Plaintiff:
Roy Earl Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mack v. TDCJ-CID et al
as 6:2017cv00345
Plaintiff:
Craig Mack
Defendant:
TDCJ-CID, UTMB, Internal Affairs Division and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eric-Cantrell Holmes v. Lorie Davis, et al
as 17-40607
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC CANTRELL HOLMES
Defendant - Appellee:
TIMOTHY R. FITZPATRICK, LEQUITTA T. EDWARDS, LISA GARRETT and others
Holmes v. Davis et al
as 6:2017cv00197
Plaintiff:
Eric-Cantrell Holmes
Defendant:
Timothy R Fitzpatrick, Lequitta T Edwards, Lisa Garrett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holmes v. Davis et al
as 1:2017cv00133
Plaintiff:
Eric-Cantrell Holmes
Defendant:
Lorie Davis, Virgil G McMullen, Vivian L Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Willink v. Christopher Sillivan, et al
as 16-41173
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID RICHARD WILLINK
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER SILLIVAN, Individual and Official Capacity, KRISTIN WENZEL, Individual and Official Capacity, PAM PACE, Individual and Official Capacity and others
Willink v. Sillivan et al
as 6:2016cv01023
Plaintiff:
David Richard Willink
Defendant:
Christopher Sillivan, Kristin Wenzel, Pam Pace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowman v. Pace et al
as 6:2016cv00493
Plaintiff:
Robert Jay Bowman
Defendant:
Pam Pace, Virginia S Schafer, Michelle Lastrapes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mathis v. Scott et al
as 6:2015cv00657
Petitioner:
Albert C Mathis
Respondent:
Kelvin Scott, B Howard, Larry L Berger and others
Defendant:
Todd K Funai, Pam Pace and Angie Carghill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mathis v. Scott et al
as 4:2015cv01897
Plaintiff:
Albert C Mathis
Defendant:
Kelvin Scott, B. Howard, Larry L Berger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
